Visiting and Constructing Mazārāt : Practice of the Prophet (s) and the Companions (r)

Visiting and Constructing Mazārāt : Practice of the Prophet (s) and the Companions (r)

baqee01

In the month of Shawwal, Muslims solemnly mark the destruction of Jannat al-Baqi’ (1345 AH/1925) and other religious sites, specifically gravesites, throughout the Hijāz (region consisting of Makkah and Madinah), by the Saudi family and their para-military known then as the Ikhwan (unrelated to the Egyptian group). Jannat al-Baqi’ is the final resting place of many notable individuals pertaining to the religion of Islam, members of the Ahl al-Bayt, all the wives of the Prophet (s) (except for Khadijah), and his noble companions; prominent among them are Hasan ibn ‘Ali, Zayn al-’Abidin, Muhammad al-Baqir, Ja’far al-Sadiq, ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib, Umm Salamah, ‘A’ishah bint Abi Bakr, ‘Uthman ibn Affan, et al. It is reported that an upwards of 7,000 individuals with ties to the Prophet (s) are buried therein, and thus its destruction is considered one of the most heinous of crimes that not only angers all Muslims, but also the Almighty.

Furthermore, it is of the utmost importance to understand why said mazārāt (gravesites) and maqāmāt were destroyed, and why the Saudis are grievously mistaken. The Saudis and their supporters follow the fanatical ideology of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, a militant fundamentalist whose literal approach toward the Islamic scriptures (Qur’an and Hadith) has led to great devastation, and continues to do so. Nonetheless, it is in this literalist fervor that they defend their indefensible crime by bringing forth the following hadith:

عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي مَرَضِهِ الَّذِي لَمْ يَقُمْ مِنْهُ ‏ “‏ لَعَنَ اللَّهُ الْيَهُودَ وَالنَّصَارَى اتَّخَذُوا قُبُورَ أَنْبِيَائِهِمْ مَسَاجِدَ ‏”

‘A’ishah reported: The Messenger of Allah (s) said during his illness from which he never recovered: “Allah cursed the Jews and the Christians for they took the graves of their prophets as mosques.” (Sahih Muslim 529)

If read without context (the folly of literalists), this hadith may seem to justify the actions of the Saudis, however, the context is always necessary. The reason for this exhortation by the Prophet (s) was to warn his community against shirk (idolatry), for shirk is the greatest of all sins in the eyes of the Almighty; and guarding against it is indeed a duty for all Muslims. But the context herein, references the Jews and Christians specifically, for they took the Prophets ‘Uzayr (‘a) and ‘Isa (‘a) as sons of God, as deities, this is mentioned in the Qur’an:

وَقَالَتِ ٱلۡيَهُودُ عُزَيۡرٌ ٱبۡنُ ٱللَّهِ وَقَالَتِ ٱلنَّصَـٰرَى ٱلۡمَسِيحُ ٱبۡنُ ٱللَّهِ‌ۖ

“And the Jews say ‘Uzayr is the son of God and the Christians say that the Messiah is the son of God.” (9:30)

The chief difference between the Muslims and those prior, is that at their masājid (places of worship), Muslim worship the Almighty whereas the others worship men. The Prophet (s) was exhorting his community to not worship him after his passing away, and by and far Muslims have not done so. Therefore, this argument against gravesites is irrelevant for Muslims and thus invalid.

Nonetheless, three questions are routinely asked by supporters of the destruction, they are: ‘what is the evidence for visiting gravesites and praying there,’ ‘what is the evidence for building masājid over the graves of pious persons,’ and ‘what is the evidence for placing one’s head in adoration on graves?’ (And when asking for evidence, it is meant from the Qur’an and Sunnah)

1. What is the evidence for visiting gravesites and praying there?

When asking for evidence concerning visiting graves and praying therein, one needs not to look further than al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah (The Beginning and the End) of the famed pupil of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Kathīr. This text is considered one of the most authoritative works on Islamic history, for Ibn Kathīr relied primarily on hadith literature, and that too which he graded as authentic. We find in this work:

عن أبي هريرة قال: كان النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يأتي قبور الشهداء فإذا أتى فرضة الشعب قال ” السلام عليكم بما صبرتم فنعم عقبى الدار ” ثم كان أبو بكر بعد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يفعله وكان عمر بعد أبي بكر يفعله، وكان عثمان بعد عمر يفعله
On the authority of Abu Hurayrah the Prophet (s) used to visit the graves of martyrs [of Uhud] annually. When he would reach the entrance of the mountain, He would salute them (the martyrs): “Peace be upon you for that you persevered in patience! Excellent indeed is the final home!” (13:24)’ Then after the Prophet (s), Abu Bakr also used to come, and after him ‘Umar used to do the same and then ‘Uthman also did the same.”
Continuing on these lines Ibn Kathīr then mentions:

وكانت فاطمة بنت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم تأتيهم فتبكي عندهم وتدعو لهم

“Fatimah, daughter of the Prophet (s), used to visit the graves of Uhud [specifically her uncle Hamzah’s] and used to weep there and pray.” (al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah, volume 4)
Therefore we find here that not only is visiting the graves of pious persons from the Sunnah, but making it a ritualistic habit of annual visitation is also from the Sunnah (important for those who criticize the practice of ‘Ashurah/Arba’īn), and that the daughter of the Prophet (s) selected this place to pray and receive barakah from the Almighty.

2. What is the evidence for building masājid over the graves of pious persons?

Those in opposition may counter our first point by saying that, fine, visiting the gravesites is from the Sunnah, but where does one receive impetus to build structures over the graves? The impetus is Qur’anic, we read in Surat al-Kahf:

وَڪَذَٲلِكَ أَعۡثَرۡنَا عَلَيۡہِمۡ لِيَعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ وَعۡدَ ٱللَّهِ حَقٌّ۬ وَأَنَّ ٱلسَّاعَةَ لَا رَيۡبَ فِيهَآ إِذۡ يَتَنَـٰزَعُونَ بَيۡنَہُمۡ أَمۡرَهُمۡ‌ۖ فَقَالُواْ ٱبۡنُواْ عَلَيۡہِم بُنۡيَـٰنً۬ا‌ۖ رَّبُّهُمۡ أَعۡلَمُ بِهِمۡ‌ۚ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ غَلَبُواْ عَلَىٰٓ أَمۡرِهِمۡ لَنَتَّخِذَنَّ عَلَيۡہِم مَّسۡجِدً۬ا

Thus did We make their case known to the people, that they might know that the promise of Allah is true, and that there can be no doubt about the Hour of Judgment. Behold, they dispute among themselves as to their affair. (Some) said “Construct a building over them”: their Lord knows best about them: those who prevailed over their affair said “Let us surely build a place of worship over them.” (18:21)

In exegesis of this verse, Ibn Kathīr writes in his Tafsīr:

{ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ غَلَبُواْ عَلَىٰ أَمْرِهِمْ لَنَتَّخِذَنَّ عَلَيْهِمْ مَّسْجِدًا } حكى ابن جرير في القائلين ذلك قولين: [أحدهما] أنهم المسلمون منهم.

“When the people of the cave went into the cave [and died], some people close to the entrance of the cave said, ‘Build a mosque so we can worship Allah.’ The people who said this were Muslims”

Therefore, we find that after the aṣḥāb al-kahf (Seven Sleepers) passed away, Muslims [of that era], not disbelievers, decided to construct a masjid over them in order to worship the Almighty. This is preserved in the Qur’an, and if it were considered a reprehensible act the Almighty would have rebuked them; but He did not and His silence implies consent. Also, the chosen progeny of the Prophet (s) and his noble companions, outrank the followers of all the prophet’s preceding, hence they too deserve the construction of masājid over their graves.

3. What is the evidence for placing one’s head in adoration on graves?

Many a times it is seen that individuals may bow their heads, placing them on graves or the ḍarīh (tombs) enclosing them, this in the view of the opposition constitutes to shirk, for they mistake adoration as prostration. Bowing one’s head in front of a beloved elder, such as grandparent is an automatic impulse, likewise hugging and kissing them, and there is no harm found in this. Nonetheless, the opposition may argue that these type of acts are perfectly fine for the living, not towards the dead. We respond that it is a practice of the rāshidūn to do as such, it is found in Imam Mālik’s Muwaṭṭāʾ:

وحدثني عن مالك أنه بلغه أن علي بن أبي طالب كان يتوسد القبور ويضطجع عليها

Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib used to rest his head on graves and lie on them. [Muwaṭṭāʾ Imām Mālik, Book 16, Hadith 34]

Therefore, these acts of adoration are not only allowed but also the practice of the pious companions, specifically those whom are considered the Rāshidūn. If ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib did as such, there is no speculation on the matter and it is forever permissible.

Conclusion

In summary there is ample evidence in both the Qur’an and Sunnah to not only justify the visitation and construction of mazārāt, but to also declare that it is established firmly in the practice of the Prophet (s) and his companions, both the Ahl al-Bayt and the Rāshidūn. So, the followers of Wahhabism, and the supporters of the House of Saud need to take utmost precaution before throwing around words like shirk, for in effect they label the Prophet (s) and his companions as mushrikun (ma’ādh Allah).

Therefore, with the strongest of words we demand the ruling family in the Hijāz to rebuild Jannat al-Baqi’ in Madinat al-Munawwarah and all the other mazārāt and maqāmāt that they have demolished, and to rebuild them with the grandeur that they rightfully deserve. We also urge the Saudis to return control of the Haramayn (The Two Sanctuaries) in Makkah and Madinah to the Muslims, for they have not only proven to be incapable of maintaining this responsibility, but have acted criminally in this position.

By: Shabbir A. Abbas

Visiting and Constructing Mazārāt : Practice of the Prophet (s) and the Companions (r)

Visiting and Constructing Mazārāt : Practice of the Prophet (s) and the Companions (r)

 

baqee01

In the month of Shawwal, Muslims solemnly mark the destruction of Jannat al-Baqi’ (1345 AH/1925) and other religious sites, specifically gravesites, throughout the Hijāz (region consisting of Makkah and Madinah), by the Saudi family and their para-military known then as the Ikhwan (unrelated to the Egyptian group). Jannat al-Baqi’ is the final resting place of many notable individuals pertaining to the religion of Islam, members of the Ahl al-Bayt, all the wives of the Prophet (s) (except for Khadijah), and his noble companions; prominent among them are Hasan ibn ‘Ali, Zayn al-’Abidin, Muhammad al-Baqir, Ja’far al-Sadiq, ‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib, Umm Salamah, ‘A’ishah bint Abi Bakr, ‘Uthman ibn Affan, et al. It is reported that an upwards of 7,000 individuals with ties to the Prophet (s) are buried therein, and thus its destruction is considered one of the most heinous of crimes that not only angers all Muslims, but also the Almighty.

 
Furthermore, it is of the utmost importance to understand why said mazārāt (gravesites) and maqāmāt were destroyed, and why the Saudis are grievously mistaken. The Saudis and their supporters follow the fanatical ideology of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, a militant fundamentalist whose literal approach toward the Islamic scriptures (Qur’an and Hadith) has led to great devastation, and continues to do so. Nonetheless, it is in this literalist fervor that they defend their indefensible crime by bringing forth the following hadith:

 
عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي مَرَضِهِ الَّذِي لَمْ يَقُمْ مِنْهُ ‏ “‏ لَعَنَ اللَّهُ الْيَهُودَ وَالنَّصَارَى اتَّخَذُوا قُبُورَ أَنْبِيَائِهِمْ مَسَاجِدَ‏”

 
‘A’ishah reported: The Messenger of Allah (s) said during his illness from which he never recovered: “Allah cursed the Jews and the Christians for they took the graves of their prophets as mosques.” (Sahih Muslim 529)

 
If read without context (the folly of literalists), this hadith may seem to justify the actions of the Saudis, however, the context is always necessary. The reason for this exhortation by the Prophet (s) was to warn his community against shirk (idolatry), for shirk is the greatest of all sins in the eyes of the Almighty; and guarding against it is indeed a duty for all Muslims. But the context herein, references the Jews and Christians specifically, for they took the Prophets ‘Uzayr (‘a) and ‘Isa (‘a) as sons of God, as deities, this is mentioned in the Qur’an:

 
وَقَالَتِ ٱلۡيَهُودُ عُزَيۡرٌ ٱبۡنُ ٱللَّهِ وَقَالَتِ ٱلنَّصَـٰرَى ٱلۡمَسِيحُ ٱبۡنُ ٱللَّهِ‌ۖ

 
“And the Jews say ‘Uzayr is the son of God and the Christians say that the Messiah is the son of God.” (9:30)

 
The chief difference between the Muslims and those prior, is that at their masājid (places of worship), Muslim worship the Almighty whereas the others worship men. The Prophet (s) was exhorting his community to not worship him after his passing away, and by and far Muslims have not done so. Therefore, this argument against gravesites is irrelevant for Muslims and thus invalid.

 
Nonetheless, three questions are routinely asked by supporters of the destruction, they are: ‘what is the evidence for visiting gravesites and praying there,’  ‘what is the evidence for building masājid over the graves of pious persons,’ and ‘what is the evidence for placing one’s head in adoration on graves?’ (And when asking for evidence, it is meant from the Qur’an and Sunnah)

  1. What is the evidence for visiting gravesites and praying there?

 
When asking for evidence concerning visiting graves and praying therein, one needs not to look further than al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah (The Beginning and the End) of the famed pupil of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Kathīr. This text is considered one of the most authoritative works on Islamic history, for Ibn Kathīr relied primarily on hadith literature, and that too which he graded as authentic. We find in this work:

 
عن أبي هريرة قال: كان النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يأتي قبور الشهداء فإذا أتى فرضة الشعب قال ” السلام عليكم بما صبرتم فنعم عقبى الدار ” ثم كان أبو بكر بعد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يفعله وكان عمر بعد أبي بكر يفعله، وكان عثمان بعد عمر يفعله

On the authority of Abu Hurayrah the Prophet (s) used to visit the graves of martyrs [of Uhud] annually. When he would reach the entrance of the mountain, He would salute them (the martyrs): “Peace be upon you for that you persevered in patience! Excellent indeed is the final home!” (13:24)’ Then after the Prophet (s), Abu Bakr also used to come, and after him ‘Umar used to do the same and then ‘Uthman also did the same.”

Continuing on these lines Ibn Kathīr then mentions:

وكانت فاطمة بنت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم تأتيهم فتبكي عندهم وتدعو لهم

 
“Fatimah, daughter of the Prophet (s), used to visit the graves of Uhud [specifically her uncle Hamzah’s] and used to weep there and pray.” (al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah, volume 4)

Therefore we find here that not only is visiting the graves of pious persons from the Sunnah, but making it a ritualistic habit of annual visitation is also from the Sunnah (important for those who criticize the practice of ‘Ashurah/Arba’īn), and that the daughter of the Prophet (s) selected this place to pray and receive barakah from the Almighty.

  

  1. What is the evidence for building masājid over the graves of pious persons?

 
Those in opposition may counter our first point by saying that, fine, visiting the gravesites is from the Sunnah, but where does one receive impetus to build structures over the graves? The impetus is Qur’anic, we read in Surat al-Kahf:

 
وَڪَذَٲلِكَ أَعۡثَرۡنَا عَلَيۡہِمۡ لِيَعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ وَعۡدَ ٱللَّهِ حَقٌّ۬ وَأَنَّ ٱلسَّاعَةَ لَا رَيۡبَ فِيهَآ إِذۡ يَتَنَـٰزَعُونَ بَيۡنَہُمۡ أَمۡرَهُمۡ‌ۖ فَقَالُواْ ٱبۡنُواْ عَلَيۡہِم بُنۡيَـٰنً۬ا‌ۖ رَّبُّهُمۡ أَعۡلَمُ بِهِمۡ‌ۚ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ غَلَبُواْ عَلَىٰٓ أَمۡرِهِمۡ لَنَتَّخِذَنَّ عَلَيۡہِم مَّسۡجِدً۬ا

 
Thus did We make their case known to the people, that they might know that the promise of Allah is true, and that there can be no doubt about the Hour of Judgment. Behold, they dispute among themselves as to their affair. (Some) said “Construct a building over them”: their Lord knows best about them: those who prevailed over their affair said “Let us surely build a place of worship over them.” (18:21)

 
In exegesis of this verse, Ibn Kathīr writes in his Tafsīr:

 
{ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ غَلَبُواْ عَلَىٰ أَمْرِهِمْ لَنَتَّخِذَنَّ عَلَيْهِمْ مَّسْجِدًا } حكى ابن جرير في القائلين ذلك قولين: [أحدهما] أنهم المسلمون منهم.

 
“When the people of the cave went into the cave [and died], some people close to the entrance of the cave said, ‘Build a mosque so we can worship Allah.’ The people who said this were Muslims”

 
Therefore, we find that after the aṣḥāb al-kahf (Seven Sleepers) passed away, Muslims [of that era], not disbelievers, decided to construct a masjid over them in order to worship the Almighty. This is preserved in the Qur’an, and if it were considered a reprehensible act the Almighty would have rebuked them; but He did not and His silence implies consent. Also, the chosen progeny of the Prophet (s) and his noble companions, outrank the followers of all the prophet’s preceding, hence they too deserve the construction of masājid over their graves.

 

  1. What is the evidence for placing one’s head in adoration on graves?

Many a times it is seen that individuals may bow their heads, placing them on graves or the ḍarīh (tombs) enclosing them, this in the view of the opposition constitutes to shirk, for they mistake adoration as prostration. Bowing one’s head in front of a beloved elder, such as grandparent is an automatic impulse, likewise hugging and kissing them, and there is no harm found in this. Nonetheless, the opposition may argue that these type of acts are perfectly fine for the living, not towards the dead. We respond that it is a practice of the rāshidūn to do as such, it is found in Imam Mālik’s Muwaṭṭāʾ:

 
وحدثني عن مالك أنه بلغه أن علي بن أبي طالب كان يتوسد القبور ويضطجع عليها

 
Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib used to rest his head on graves and lie on them. [Muwaṭṭāʾ Imām Mālik, Book 16, Hadith 34]

 
Therefore, these acts of adoration are not only allowed but also the practice of the pious companions, specifically those whom are considered the Rāshidūn. If ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib did as such, there is no speculation on the matter and it is deemed forever permissible.

 
Conclusion

In summary there is ample evidence in both the Qur’an and Sunnah to not only justify the visitation and construction of mazārāt, but to also declare that it is established firmly in the practice of the Prophet (s) and his companions, both the Ahl al-Bayt and the Rāshidūn. So, the followers of Wahhabism, and the supporters of the House of Saud need to take utmost precaution before throwing around words like shirk, for in effect they label the Prophet (s) and his companions as mushrikun (ma’ādh Allah).

 
Therefore, with the strongest of words we demand the ruling family in the Hijāz to rebuild Jannat al-Baqi’ in Madinat al-Munawwarah and all the other mazārāt and maqāmāt that they have demolished, and to rebuild them with the grandeur that they rightfully deserve. We also urge the Saudis to return control of the Haramayn (The Two Sanctuaries) in Makkah and Madinah to the Muslims, for they have not only proven to be incapable of maintaining this responsibility, but have acted criminally in this position.

 

By Shabbir A. Abbas

The Experience of Entering ‘Israel’ as a Shi’ah Muslim…

19250843_10158835709010285_3799247488580277750_o

 

As a Shi’ah who recently visited Palestine/Jerusalem, I awaited till this day, Yawm al-Quds (Quds Day) to speak about my experiences, and specifically on what changed my outlook on the entire conflict therein.

 

For those who have visited ‘Israel’ before can confirm, if you travel there on an American passport they cannot deny you entry but can interrogate you; and in their interrogation they ask you certain compromising questions in which if you answer improperly, they can bar your entry for upwards of 10+ years. Therefore, you have to answer their questions as truthfully as possible [as they already know everything about you and just want verbal confirmation], but at the same time not get stuck in one of their verbal traps. They [the Israelis] also utilize every trick in the book to fluster those being interrogated, for example if the individual is a young man they make sure the interrogator is an attractive but extremely stern woman, and opposite for females. Obviously when I arrived at the Allenby Border Crossing, the Israelis wouldn’t just let me pass (for those who don’t know, I’m not white), and you can guess what happens next, I happen to get selected for the said interrogation with said woman interrogator.

 

The first question she barked at me was:

‘Why are you wearing sunglasses!?’

 

They are prescribed, but before I could even open my mouth to respond she barked again (with full anger):

‘DON’T YOU DARE SPEAK TO ME WHILE WEARING SUNGLASSES!!!’

 

So I took them off, and I’m not gonna lie at this point I was shook, but thankfully I gathered myself for her following onslaught of questions.

 

And of course the very first question she asks is:

‘Are you a Shi’ah?’

 

Knowing that they don’t allow Shi’ah’s entry because of Iran and remembering that I need to answer truthfully, but also not truthfully I responded:

‘I consider myself just a Muslim, not a follower of a sect’

 

She continued to ask me this same question in different ways, and I kept responding near verbatim.

 

She then changed up the question a bit:

‘So you are ‘just a Muslim’ and don’t believe in sects, but aren’t your parents Shi’ah?’

 

I responded:

‘They are as I am’

 

And she continued asking similar questions, also asking about my grandparents and other relatives. She then opened my passport and started quizzing me about some of the places I visited, when she got to Iraq, her demeanor changed and her questions became entirely venomous, to the extent that I can’t express in any written way. Her questions became extremely sulfuric in nature, and I could feel the personal vitriol she had for me.

 

She hissed:

‘You have been to Karbala?!’

‘Why did you go there and WHAT DOES KARBALA MEAN TO YOU?!’

 

If my heart were given the reins I would have responded:

‘Karbala means everything to me, my wealth, my family, my blood, my soul, my entire existence, everything I’d sacrifice for it.’

 

But, obviously I did not say that, let alone answer in a straight way, I instead replied:

 

‘My university Rutgers, has a relationship with the University of Kufa (which it does) and I visit Iraq often in order to visit the university specifically, afterwards as a lover of history I have visited all the historical sites in Southern Iraq because it is relatively safe.’

 

Even though my university has a relationship with the University of Kufa, visiting it would never be a priority, so I straight up lied there, but this is the kind of lie that can’t be disproved. Nonetheless, this one question kept repeating in my ears the entire trip, the poisonous way it was asked kept paining my heart, and it singlehandedly changed my entire outlook on the conflict.  

 

She continued assaulting me with similar Shi’ah/Karbala related questions and I kept deflecting to the best of my abilities, after that, without having touched my phone she started asking me private questions which only someone with access to my phone and email could do so. That freaked me out, but then again these are Israelis, if they don’t know your secrets who else would know? Nonetheless, I somehow managed to pass the interrogation but was kept nearly half a day and only released half past midnight.

 

For those who know me know that I’ve always been active in anti-Israel/anti-apartheid activities especially during my undergrad years, a simple Google search could easily verify that. I’ve written articles on the issue, and even been invited on Fox News to discuss my anti-Israel views. But the Israelis had zero concern with all of that, they were instead fixed on my Shi’i background.

 

Honestly, after the rise of ISIS, and seeing many poor uneducated Palestinian refugees join the terror group and attack the Shi’i community, take part in suicide bombing campaigns in Zaynabiyah (Damascus) and other religiously significant places, I took a step back from my activism and stopped vocally supporting Palestinian liberation. But after witnessing first hand the Israeli hatred for Shi’ism [and the message of Karbala], whatever distance there was between myself and the righteous cause evaporated, and I am now fully convinced that Imam al-Khomeini’s edicts commanding the Shi’ah community to support the Palestinians was not only appropriate but that the Palestinian cause is one in the same as the Shi’i cause, for their [Israeli] enmity for our communities is one and the same.  

 

I have traveled to lands where takfiris rule, and I have also lived among takfiris but no hatred towards my creed was displayed in way of words as did on that day. If any Shi’i, after reading this still differs, they are grievously mistaken.

By: Shabbir A. Abbas

‘Alī (‘a), the Grandson of ‘Alī (‘a): Communicating With the Almighty

‘Alī (‘a), the Grandson of ‘Alī (‘a): Communicating With the Almighty

Written by: Shabbir Agha Abbas

baqi

(Grave of Zayn al-ʿAbidīn (‘a) in Madinah)

On the 5th of Sha’bān‎ (38 AH) arrived a newborn in the household of ‘Alī ibn Abī Tālib (‘a) a blessing for not just him, but for humanity as a whole; the child being his eponymous grandson ‘Alī, who grew up to be known as Zayn al-ʿAbidīn (the adornment of the worshipers) and Sayyid al-Sājidīn (the master of the prostrators).* Both grandfather and grandson are remembered today for their mastery of the Arabic language, using it to draw mankind closer to their creator; the former by his thought-provoking sermons and exhortations and the latter with his arousing supplications.

The distinction between the two does not at all suggest that one was greater or lacking, but instead signifies the differing circumstances they were in. The grandfather, albeit shortly as the Caliph, was given utmost command over the pulpit whereas the grandson lived in an antagonistic era wherein he was restrained to the ṣaf (prayer rows) amongst the common worshippers, hence the essence may have been the same but the appearance not at all. As Zayn al-ʿAbidīn (‘a) was largely restricted to being just one amongst the worshippers, the means for the believers to be exposed to and ultimately guided by the inherited Prophetic teachings was limited to observing the Imam in his worship, in his prayers.

As the magnificent words of the grandfather, ‘Alī, have been preserved beautifully in the Nahj al-Balāghah, the words of the grandson ‘Alī have been preserved in al-Ṣaḥīfat al-Sajādīyah. However, unlike the Nahj, the Ṣaḥīfah was not compiled by scholars centuries after, it instead was inscribed by the Imam’s son Zayd ibn ‘Alī (‘a) whilst the Imam was narrating these divine supplications. It was written in the presence and on the command of the Imam. Hence, this special book is regarded by the historians as one of the earliest works to have been preserved in such pristine manner, and according to the hadith specialists this work is considered mutawātir, therefore unquestionably authentic. Therefore, in importance this work comes second only to the Qur’ān, and its relationship with the Qur’ān is like no other.

The Qur’ān in function is the divine speech of God to mankind, whereas in function the al-Ṣaḥīfat al-Sajādīyah is the perfect response of mankind to this speech. When reading the Qur’ān alongside the Ṣaḥīfah, it doesn’t seem as if they are two distinct texts instead they read as if they are in the form of discussion. How can this be so? It is, by not being a mere supplication in the form of petitioning the Almighty; instead it is a supplication surrounded by exegesis of the Qur’ān. To demonstrate this, the supplication that the Imam recited in Sha’bān‎ in anticipation of Ramaḍān is a worthy example, an excerpt:

“وَ الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي جَعَلَ مِنْ تِلْكَ السُّبُلِ شَهْرَهُ, شَهْرَ رَمَضَانَ, شَهْرَ الصِّيَامِ، وَ شَهْرَ الْإِسْلَامِ, وَ شَهْرَ الطَّهُورِ، وَ شَهْرَ التَّمْحِيصِ، وَ شَهْرَ الْقِيَامِ الَّذِي أُنْزِلَ فِيهِ الْقُرْآنُ ، هُدًى لِلنَّاسِ ، وَ بَيِّنَاتٍ مِنَ الْهُدَى وَ الْفُرْقَانِ“**

“And praise belongs to God who appointed among those roads His month, the month of Ramaḍān, the month of fasting, the month of submission, the month of purity, the month of putting to test, the month of standing in prayer, in which the Qur’an was sent down as guidance to the people, and as clear signs of the Guidance and the Separator!”***

As all proper supplications begin with an adoration of the Almighty, the Imam does so, but in doing so he mentions the month of Ramaḍān, briefly extolling its virtues. After listing them, when he continues on by saying ‘in which’ (الَّذِي) at that moment the words transition from his to Allah’s, however, the translition is entirely seamless. One cannot by the words alone discern the distinction between the two sources; it very well feels as though the train of thought is one of unison.

Nevertheless, being interspersed with verses is a general motif of the supplications, therefore the communiqué that is the Ṣaḥīfah can be understood as a petition to the Almighty using the Almighty’s own words, therefore the efficacy in communication is ultimate. It can quite simply be surmised as such, that the Prophet (s) introduced us to the Almighty (His oneness), whereas ‘Alī described the ṣifāt of the Almighty, and Zayn al-ʿAbidīn showed us how to communicate with the Almighty. As the month of the Qur’ān descends upon us, it would benefit us immeasurably to use this Ṣaḥīfah as our means of communication with Allah ‘azza wa jal, and to attain His proximity.

—-

* There are disagreements on whether he was born in Kufa or Madinah, but it is agreed that he was born during the Caliphate of his grandfather.

** al-Ṣaḥīfat al-Sajādīyah, Supplication 44

*** Qur’ān 2:185

Three Prescriptions From the Pharmacy of ‘Alī (‘a)

Three Prescriptions From the Pharmacy of ‘Alī (‘a)

By: Shabbir Agha Abbas

natural-medicine-300x300

As it is the birth month of ‘Alī ibn Abī Tālib (‘a), Rajab al-Murajjab, it would be more than beneficial to revisit the vast pharmacy of wisdom that is the collection of sayings, exhortations, and advice of our beloved Imām. The way it is routine to make monthly visits to dispensaries to refill one’s prescriptions for the ‘ilāj (remedy) of their bodies, it should also be imperative for one to revisit the verses of the Qur’ān and the ahadith for they too are remedies for not just the individual’s physical selves but also that of their souls. The special status of Amīr al-Muʾminīn is that his prescriptions are not just dual in the sense that they remedy both physical and spiritual ailments, but that they are dually relevant to believers and disbelievers alike, beneficial for all who possess intellect.

Of the many written collections of our Imām’s wisdom, there is none more notable than the Nahj al-Balāghah compiled by al-Sharīf al-Raī. However, the Nahj is not all encompassing, therefore it is crucial for both students of knowledge and those seeking healing to search for his wisdom wherever one can find it. As mentioned above the relevancy of his wisdom is transcending so scholars from a wide array of schools and ideologies within Islām have all partaken in this quest to find and record this unquantifiable source of wisdom that is our Imām. Therefore, we find some of the greatest of works on the life and legacy of ‘Alī ibn Abī Tālib to not have been produced by just his Shī’ah, but by others such as the Khaṣāʾiṣ Amīr al-Muʾminīn of Imām al-Nasā’ī (al-Nasā’ī being one of the six compilers of the Sunni Ṣiah al-Sittah/Authentic Six); this Khaṣāʾiṣ is an extremely important collection of the virtues and individual merits of the Imām. Likewise, the work Dastūr Ma’ālam al-Hikam of the Shāfi’ī scholar al-Qāī al-Quā’ī [employed by the Fatimids] is a compilation of the wisdom of Amīr al-Muʾminīn in the guise of his literary and oratorical brilliance. Luckily, these two works have been translated into the English language, the former by Shaykh Michael Mumisa and the latter by Dr. Tahera Qutbuddin, respectively. It would be quite valuable to obtain these two translations and keep them alongside one’s copy of the Nahj al-Balāghah.

Nonetheless, returning to the prescriptive function of the narrations of ‘Alī ibn Abī Tālib three from the Dastūr Ma’ālam al-Hikam have been chosen for the benefit of those reading.

1. دع عنك اظن واحسب وارى

Avoid saying “I guess,” “I suppose,” and “I reckon”

Speaking without knowledge is one of the greatest follies of mankind, not only is it sinful but it can lead to serious ramifications in not just one’s own life but that of other’s as well. Assumptions are dangerous, because they aren’t typically based on facts but largely based on emotions and personal biases. It is best if one thoroughly searches for the truth, and if one cannot attain it then at least admit to not knowing. Saying, ‘I do not know’ is a good practice for one to remain humble, and humility is a good trait for a Muslim to possess.

 

2. تخير لوردك

Choose carefully where you water your camels.

In the time of Amīr al-Muʾminīn camels served as the source of livelihood for many a people. Not only were camels important vehicles for transportation, they too provided revenue for their owners by means of their fur (textiles) and milk (dairy); hence they were tools of economic sustenance. But as any business requires capital to grow, camels need to be fed and watered, however even in the water-starved deserts of Arabia a camel cannot be made to drink from any pond or well, the source of water must first be deduced that it is not tainted. Likewise, when we search for our rizq (sustenance) we too must thoroughly ensure that its source is pure, lest we suffer the consequences.

 

3. لا تقض وانت غضبان ولا من النوم سكران

Do not judge when you are angry or intoxicated by sleep.

Many a times in life we make irresponsible and even irreparable decisions while not in a proper state of mind, especially in times of rage and impairment. When one is angry their inhibitions are lowered, and thus more likely to hurt others and to take risks. Therefore we are seeing more and more companies offering anger management courses to its employees, for an angry state of mind poses not just an unsafe environment but also risks the success of that business. As anger is inappropriate for the workplace, it too is inappropriate for our personal lives. Similarly, intoxication whether by the depravity of sleep or the consumption of drugs can result in horrible consequences, the disasters related to intoxicated driving are enough for one to comprehend.

 
The above three are simple short phrases that one could easily impress into their minds, and like the above there is no shortage of prescriptions from the Imām. So gather a few compilation books, however, not to just read, but to make the wisdom of the Imām as found in these books an active participant in one’s life, make it regimen to jot down and memorize these sayings if not daily then at least monthly. Surely, doing so will lead one to both a complete and fulfilling life and a successful hereafter.

 

(This article was originally written for the Masjid-e-Ali Newsletter: https://s3.amazonaws.com/masjid-e-ali.org/April+Newsletter.pdf )

The Practice of Jihād

Please recite a Sūrat al-Fātiḥah for the 1700 cadets of Camp Speicher who were brutally murdered on this day last year (6/12), and for all the righteous mujahideen past, present, and future, who have laid down their lives fi sabil Allah (in the way of God).

iraqi-soldiers-massacred-RIPjpg

The Practice of Jihād

When studying religions one will ultimately arrive at the understanding that all religions comprise of two fundamental things, which are principles and practices. Similarly the religion of Islam, specifically Shi’i Islam, too consists of these two divisions. The principles being the Uṣūl ad-Dīn and the practices being the furūʿ ad-dīn, for a Shi’i to properly follow his/her religion it is compulsory to adhere to the principles and performing the said practices, neglecting them or rebuffing them would be tantamount to disbelief. Of the compulsory practices one such practice is rather infamous, it is the practice of jihād. This blog-post will attempt to answer three essential questions on jihād and they are:

What is jihād?

What are the different forms of jihād?

What are the consequences of not performing jihād?

What is jihād?

In the simplest of definitions jihād means ‘to strive,’ in Islamic terminology it denotes to any form of activity, either personal or community-wide, of Muslims in attempting to strive for the cause of God and for the sake of Islam. And when you strive for the sake of something your goal is to preserve that thing, to protect it from dangers; hence to further understand what jihād is an example must be given of dangers currently threatening Islam, the greatest threat to Islam today is an internal threat, the threat of extremism. Extremists, specifically under the tutelage of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, such as ISIS and al-Qaeda have put the entire Islamic world in a state of crisis thus in continuing this discussion on jihād the example of extremists will be used as to whom jihād must be performed against.

What are the different forms of jihād?

The practice of jihād has many forms, of which 5 are most notable, they are:

  • jihād bil-qalb/nafs – jihād of the heart/soul

This form of jihād is also known as al-jihād al-akbar, or ‘the greater jihād,’ it is the individual’s internal struggle to protect his/her faith from the temptations of Shaytan. In a time when the image of Islam is being tarnished by extremists it is very easy for one to become disaffected by Islam, in this case jihād bil-qalb/nafs requires the individual to do whatever possible to strengthen and guard his/her iman, or faith in Islam. When the world is shunning Islam and life begins to become increasingly difficult for Muslims a practical way to perform this jihād is to delve into a state of tazkiyah al-nafs, ‘self-purification,’ by studying and acting upon the sharīʿah as found in the traditions of the Holy Prophet (s) and his purified progeny (s). By doing such one will be able to achieve a qalb salim, tranquil heart, thus affirming one’s faith and ultimately deflecting the temptations of Shaytan.

“Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” (Qur’an 2:16)

Shahrokh_Rezvani_Tranquil_Heart_1

  • jihād bil-lisan – jihād by the tongue

This form of jihād is an external jihād, wherein Islam is defended by the use of one’s speech. How can Islam be defended by one’s speech? Easy, by talking to those in one’s reach one can rid the misconceptions and lies about the religion, this can extend to giving lectures and debating. And since social media now has become an extension of one’s speech it too falls under this format of jihād. Therefore in context of the given example one can debunk the falsity of extremist Islam by presenting the true teachings of the Holy Prophet (s) and his purified progeny (s); of which a simple method would be sharing factual articles on facebook/twitter. Inviting to the religion of Islam, da’awah, too falls under this category.

“By (the Token of) Time (through the ages), Verily Man is in loss, Except such as have Faith, and do righteous deeds, and (join together) in the mutual teaching of Truth, and of Patience and Constancy.” (Qur’an 103)

“Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.” (Qur’an 16:125)

Microphone and stand in the spotlight

  • jihād bil-qalam/’ilm – jihād by the pen/knowledge

This jihād requires the individual to engage in scholarly research in order to defend Islam from said misconceptions and lies, therefore this jihād goes hand in hand with the jihād bil-lisan. How can one share factual articles on social media if there is no one to write the articles in the first place? Hence, becoming a bookworm in order to distinguish truth from falsehood is an act of jihād bil-qalam/’ilm. The Imams from the Ahl al-Bayt (s) have repeatedly emphasized the importance of this jihād.

Amir al-Mu’minīn ‘Ali (‘a) has said: ” …The reward of a religious scholar is greater than the reward of a person who is fasting on days and establishes prayers during the night and fights in the Holy War for the sake of Allah. And, when a religious scholar dies, there will appear a gap in Islam which cannot be compensated except by a replacement of that (kind).” (Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 2, p. 43)

Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (‘a) has said: “The scholars of our followers are the guards of the bounds of Islam. Then, anyone of our followers who undertakes this (duty) is superior to the one who fights in the battle against the Romans, (because this one defends the theological bounds of our followers).” (AI-Ihtijaj, vol. 2, p. 155)

ink

  • jihād bil-yad – jihād by the hand

This form of jihād requires physical action. If one witnesses wrongdoing/injustice the action taken to stop it is this jihād. Examples in practice would be stopping a thief, saving a life, aiding the homeless, etc. This jihād fundamentally is to stand up for what is right, always.
no-trespassing-stop-hand-and-not-symbol

  • jihād bil-sayf – jihād by the sword

This form of jihād, perhaps the most misunderstood and maligned, deals with the usage of violence or qital fi sabilillah, or fighting in the way of God. This form of jihād tends to be a last resort and only situationally compulsory, therefore it is fittingly known as al-jihād al-asghar. In the plethora of misconceptions about Islam this jihād is precisely why the term jihād itself is infamously mistranslated as ‘holy war,’ therefore being aware to the realities of this format is crucial. The only two situations where jihād bil-sayf is permissible is:

  1. Initiated jihād (fighting against oppression/evil)
  2. For self-defense

Furthermore there are a number of rules of engagement that must be upheld when conducting jihād bil-sayf. Some of which are:

-jihād must only be in the name of Allah, and in the case of Initiated jihād declared only by His Prophet (s), the Imam/Hakim, or their deputies. The current jihād in Iraq against ISIS only became valid after the maraj’e, the representatives of the Imam al-’Asr (‘a), declared it so.

-Offensive war is not allowed, jihād bil-sayf is defensive in nature.

-jihād is only in the cause of God and for the sake of Islam, it is not allowed to wage violence for personal gain, wealth, vengeance, etc.

-The sick, elderly, women and children should not be harmed, neither should the natural world (trees, vegetation, animals).

-Places of worship are not be demolished.

-Indiscriminate killings should be avoided and the corpses of the enemy must not be disfigured.

-The prisoners of war must be treated humanely and not be tortured.

Even though this form of jihād is situational it is also a requirement to be in a state of preparedness for said situation, meaning one needs to remain physically fit, be knowledgeable in the art of war, know how to use weaponry and artillery.

imam-hussain-in-battle-of-karbala

What are the consequences of not performing jihād?

First and foremost the neglecting or abstaining from one’s duty of jihād is considered a major sin in Islam. Doing so of the lesser jihād, jihād bil-sayf, incurs the wrath of the Almighty hence the consequence of not performing the greater jihād, jihād bil-qalb/nafs must too be equally if not more unpleasant.

“O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, then turn not your backs to them. And whoever shall turn his back to them on that day- unless he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company then he, indeed, becomes deserving of Allah’s wrath and his abode is hell; and an evil destination shall it be.” (Qur’an 8:15-16)

Similarly the great martyred scholar Sayyid ‘Abd al-Husayn Dastghaib Shirazi has reported that Amir al-Mu’minīn ‘Ali (‘a) has said:

“Those who flee from the battlefield should know that they have angered their Lord and have damned themselves to destruction because fleeing from the battle causes Allah’s anger. And one who flees from the Holy war will be certain to face calamities and eternal degradation and his fleeing will not prevent death, and his life cannot be prolonged. That is, if the time of his death has arrived, his fleeing will not delay it. He will die due to some other reason. On the other hand, if the time of his death has not yet arrived and he participates in jihād he will not die. Thus it is better for one to pledge his life to Allah rather than live in Allah’s anger, degradation and dishonour.” (Greater Sins Vol 2, The Twenty-Seventh Greater Sin, p. 191)

Discussion
The practice of jihād should be given utmost importance, especially in this day and age when extremists are bent on hijacking Islam. In this past year 40,000 of our comrades, in Iraq alone, have been martyred in the performance of jihād bil-sayf, therefore no excuses should be given for not performing the other 4 forms of jihād especially when the format and methodology have been thoroughly explained. The dangers posed by extremists are real and must be combatted, be it with our hearts, tongues, pens, hands, or lives.

Written by:

Agha Shabbir Abbas

A Glimpse into the Relationship of Shi’ism and Sufism; With a Special Emphasis on the Works of Mawlana Rumi

Written by: Agha Shabbir Abbas

Haydar-e-Karrar

Introduction

This paper will serve as a brief investigation into the point of view of the Shi’a Muslims in regards to Sufism. The focal point of this is to understand as to why the Shi’a Muslims tend to take credit for personalities who were non-Shi’a, specifically Sufi. The paper has been divided into two parts, the first part “A Glimpse into the Relationship” of Shi’ism and Sufism whereas the second part is titled “The Works of Mawlana Rumi”. Dividing the paper into two parts provides a much needed structure to an otherwise ambiguous topic. The first half of the paper deals with basic theological and historical similarities as well as convergences. The second half of the paper deals with a brief input on Shams al-Din Tabrizi the spiritual master and Shaykh of Mawlana Rumi. The second half continues with a selection of Mawlana Rumi’s poetry in which fundamental Shi’a polemics are derived.

 

A Glimpse into the Relationship:

Overlooking the differences in appearance and name, Shi’ism and Sufism are quite similar, albeit in a complex manner. This similarity in the view of the Shi’a cause many allegations to be produced that such and such Sufi personalities or thinker were in actuality Shi’a. Notable examples are Mawlana Rumi, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, and the late-modern Allama Iqbal. This paper is an effort to understand the reasoning behind such phenomena.

Before delving into the issue, what Shi’ism is and who Shi’a are must be defined. Shahram Pazouki, an Iranian philosopher of religion defines Shi’ism broadly by saying that a “Shiite (Shi’a), not in the current sense of the jurists or dialectical theologians, but in its true meaning, that is, belief in the continuing spirituality and walayah of the Prophet in the person of ‘Ali, and belief that after the Prophet there is always a living guide (wali) on the way of love,” he defines Sufism as “the way of the heart (walayah) is the way of love, in which the wayfarer purifies his heart until he gains union with God..” (Pazouki 29)  Similarly the famed Professor of Islamic studies, Henry Corbin says that “the term walayah has been used frequently, and we know that Shi’ism is a religion of walayah.” Hence those who accept walayah are wholeheartedly Shi’a, no matter what they call themselves. This rather loose definition of Shi’ism gives the Shi’a freedom from historical accuracy when allotting Sufi figures to them-selves; especially since this definition would be inclusive of a large otherwise non-Shi’a population.

 

Nonetheless the complexity between both movements derives from the fact that both Shi’ism and Sufism are much involved with the spiritual aspects of Islam, they both look at Islam with a dual mindset, where there are the Dhahir, exoteric, and Batin, esoteric, spheres of Islam. However other than these two outlooks there is also the sectarian difference between Shi’ism and Sunnism, where the practitioners of Sufism tend to align themselves with the latter sect.

 

In function, Sufism has been used by Sunnis to decorate Sunnism with esoteric beliefs, of which it would have otherwise lacked. Largely, for Sunnism, the concept of esotericism is foreign. However, in comparison Shi’ism is entrenched from its core, with esoteric principles. The famed 14th century Islamic historiographer, Ibn Khaldun, affirms that much of the esoteric concepts and beliefs upheld in Sufism find origination in Shi’ism. He says in his Muqaddimah:

 

“The Sufis thus became saturated with Shi’ah theories. (Shi’ah) theories entered so deeply into their religious ideas that they based their practice of using a cloak (khirqah) on the (alleged) fact that ‘Ali clothed al-Hasan al-Basri in such a cloak and caused him to agree solemnly that he would adhere to the mystic path. (The tradition thus inaugurated by ‘Ali) was continued, according to the Sufis, through al-Junayd, one of the Sufi shaykhs. However, it is not known with certainty that ‘Ali did any such thing. The (mystic) path was not reserved to ‘Ali, but all the men around Muhammad were models of the (various) paths of religion. The fact that (the Sufis) restrict (precedence in mysticism) to ‘All smells strongly of pro-Shi’ah sentiment. This and other afore-mentioned Sufi ideas show that the Sufis have adopted, pro-Shi’ah sentiments and have become enmeshed in them.” (Muqaddimah 3.51)

 

Thus the Shi’a strongly insist that Sufism branched off of Shi’ism and the truth may have become hidden in fact due to taqiyyah, religious dissimulation. It is not an uncommon of Shi’a to claim that the ancestors of modern day Sufis were in fact concealing their beliefs. There is a lengthy history of Sufis being executed upon disclosure of their beliefs, Hallaj being a shining example. Presumably the Sufis hid their true beliefs in response to hostile oppressors. Seyyed Hossein Nasr explains “from the Shi’ite point of view Shi’ism is the origin of what later came to be known as Sufism. But here by Shi’ism is meant the esoteric instructions of the Prophet, the asrar which many Shi’ite authors have identified with the Shi’ite ‘concealment’, taqayah” (Nasr 230) The followers of ‘Ali, due to intense persecution, “practiced dissimulation (taqiyyah) during the entire period of the Imams, and even later”. (Tabandeh 23)

 

Nonetheless all movements in Islam claim to originate from the Qur’an, the central religious text for Muslims, and the Sunnah, Prophetic teachings, traditions, and practices. The difference being, that in Shi’ism, the Sunnah does not conclude with the death of the Prophet, but instead it continues on with his inheritor, the Imam. These Imams for the Shi’a are divinely selected descendants of Muhammad whose word is viewed no less than the Prophet himself. This concept of Imamat is totally rejected in Sunnism, however in Sufism many of the Shi’a Imams played an integral role in developing their religious tendencies, they were “representatives of Islamic esotericism.” (Nasr 231) The role of the Shi’a Imams in the development of Sufism is clear evidence that the two movements shared key derivatives. And this is not surprising because much of the early Islamic history is unclear; as such the first four centuries of Islamic history are largely understood to have lacked the definite sectarianism seen today.

 

Many of the common universally accepted aspects of esotericism developed during this era, which for the Shi’a, are seen as exclusively of Shi’a origin. This can best be witnessed in the Sufi and/or Sunni biography of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first Shi’a Imam. Recorded in the authentic books of the Shi’a and Sunni, the Prophet Muhammad towards the end of his life declared ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib as his successor. The extent of this declaration is the fundamental point of divergence between Shi’ism and Sunnism, for the Shi’a insist that ‘Ali was the successor of the Prophet completely, as in politically and spiritually. This is exactly where the term Shi’a came from, Shi’atu ‘Ali, the partisans of ‘Ali. In contrast the Sunni largely ignore the declaration of the Prophet in regards to ‘Ali because they see it as something specific to a certain situation and not something timeless. However the Sufis accept the significance of the declaration similar to the Shi’a but only in a spiritual sense. The Sufi look to ‘Ali as the spiritual authority directly after the Prophet, hence all Sufi chains begin with ‘Ali albeit one. Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, a contemporary Sufi, explains the importance of the said declaration that “’Alī’s spiritual sovereignty and its unconditional acceptance is binding on the believers till the Day of Judgment. It clearly proves that anyone who denies ‘Alī’s spiritual leadership in fact denies the Prophet’s leadership” (Qadri 5) This increased importance for ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib in both Shi’ism and Sufism is a strong indication towards their shared history. Of the many Sufi Tariqats, paths, ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib and his descendants the Imams play immense roles. The Qadiriyya and the Naqshbandiyya silsilahs share with the Shi’a their Imams. The Qadiriyya in their order begin with the first 8 Imams of the Ithnaashariyya, whereas the Naqshbandiyya hold Ja’far al-Sadiq with high esteem. Many of the Sufi saints were either disciples of the Shi’a Imams or held very close relationships with them, “Hasan al-Basri and Uways al-Qarani were disciples of ‘Ali; Ibrahim al-Adham, Bishr al-Hafi, and Bayazid al-Bastami were associated with the circle of Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq; and Ma’ruf al-Karkhi was a close companion of Imam Rida.” (Nasr 231)

 

Moving on, Shi’ism unlike Sufism is bound to a specific Islamic legislation, a Shari’a. Sufism as noted earlier is not. Thus a Sufi can follow the Hanafi legislation whilst also following a Sufi Tariqah (order). However this creates a gap between the esoteric and exoteric practices of Islam, whereas in Shi’ism all of the exoteric practices are in fact a means towards esotericism. The goal of “Shi’ism, even in its outward aspect, is oriented toward the spiritual stations (maqamat-‘irfani)”, to attain awareness. (Nasr 232)

In Sufism there is a concept of sainthood called walayah, mentioned in the definition of Shi’as, wherein saints are called walis or awliya. To become a formal practitioner of Sufism one must be initiated into the tariqat by a Wali. In Sufism and Shi’ism the first Wali after the Prophet is ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib. Whereas this walayah in Shi’ism  is present at a much different level. Walayah for the Shi’a encompasses all aspects of authority; the wali in Shi’ism is the ultimate power, politically, spiritually, and so forth. In Sufism the wali is only the spiritual authority. This chain of walayah in both Sufism and Shi’ism is one that is continuous, beginning with the Prophet Adam till the modern era. The role of the Qutb (the pole/axis) within Sufism and that of the Imam in Shi’ism are by and large synonymous; for the Imam is more or less a Sufi Shaykh who is also the ultimate jurist. Hence for the Shi’a, all those who agree upon ‘Ali being the direct wali after the Prophet must be considered as adherents of Shi’ism, for accepting him as the Qutb they are in fact accepting his Imamat. This concept of the Sufis is of such similarity with the Shi’as that Sayyid Haydar Amuli, a 14th century Shi’a theologian and mystic, says that “the Qutb and the Imam are two expressions possessing the same meaning and referring to the same person.”(Nasr 235) In Shi’ism the Imams all possess ‘ismah, infallibility, similarly the Qutb in Sufism is al-Insaan al-Kaamil, meaning the perfect human thus also infallible. Sayyid Haydur Amuli also “believed that every true Shi’ite is a Sufi and every true Sufi is a Shi’ite.” (Nasr 238)

 

The Works of Mawlana Rumi:

After broadly highlighting the basic fundamental similarities between Shi’ism and Sufism as well as why Shi’as put forward claims on Sufism, it would be imperative to narrow the discussion on one particular topic. Due to his preeminence in the rank and file of Sufis the relationship between Shi’ism and Sufism must be analyzed through the works of Mawlana Rumi. But before delving into the personality of Mawlana Rumi we must briefly look at his spiritual instructor Shams al-Din Tabrizi because he also plays a role in the Shi’a allegations.

 

Shams al-Din Tabrizi in the eyes of the Shi’a plays the role of a Shi’a quite well, for his reclusions indicated that he relied much on the Shi’a practice of taqiyyah, defined earlier as dissimilation. Shams al-Din Tabrizi was able to escape in thin air, living amongst the people of Konya until he felt uncomfortable. Shams al-Din Tabrizi in his autobiography, Maqalat-i Shams-i Tabrizi, is presented as someone who could was surrounded in mystery. Shams al-Din Tabrizi is portrayed as if he could escape from the impossible.

 

“If a tree could run or fly,

it would not suffer

from the teeth of a saw

or the blows of an axe” (3,II:1244-46)

 

Shams al-Din Tabrizi generally is an individual whose biography is rather quiet on his self and his origins. As a result there is much speculation on him. In the Maqalat of Haj Bektash Wali, the Alevi mystic and philosopher, Shams al-Din Tabrizi is recorded to have been an “embroider” which happens to be the profession of another Shams al-Din, the 28th Shi’a Nizari Ismaili Imam, further fuelling the speculation of the people. (Virani 51) Another point of speculation on the character of Shams al-Din Tabrizi is the Shi’a mystic of Multan, named Shams al-Din Sabzwari. Sabzwari like Tabrizi lived in the 12th and 13th centuries. The evidence for two other Shams al-Din’s both of Shi’a origin raises many questions for the aforesaid community.

 

Moving on as discussed earlier walayah plays a huge role in Sufism. Walayah derives from the root wly “of which the words, wali, mawla, and mawlawi” are derived. (Pazouki 30) These three terms specifically the latter are highly significant in the study of Mawlana Rumi, for the very Sufi order initiated by Mawlana Rumi is known as the Mawlawi. Mawlana Rumi’s order is named justly as such for he emphasizes the importance of the living wali at many a places. He says in the Mathnawi:

 

“Thou dost not see this, that the nearness of the awliya (to God) hath

a hundred miracles and pomps and powers.” (Nicholson)

“Even now there exists a Solomon,

but we are blinded by exulting in our farsightedness” (3, II: 3731)

 

“Therefore in every epoch a wali arises: the probation (of the people) lasts until the resurrection” (3, II:815).

“He is the Mahdi (the guided one) and the Hadi (the guide), O seeker of the way: he is both hidden and seated before your face.” (3,II:818)

 

The above three couplets if read by a Shi’a quite strongly point towards the concept of Imamat, especially that of the occulted Mahdi. Mawlana Rumi clearly points towards the common man as being visually impaired and that the wali is evident yet unbeknownst to the commoners. The wali is “the ever-living spiritual presence of Islam” whether evident or hidden. (Nasr 232) This seemingly not only hints at the Shi’a issue of ghaybah, but also the occultation of the Shi’a Imam. In the collection of Shi’a hadith the Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq is known to have said that “The earth will (likewise) not remain devoid of such a representative of God till the occurrence of the Hour for if it were to remain devoid of a representative from God, then God would not be worshipped!’ (A man by the name of) Sulayman then said: ‘I asked al-Sadiq‚ So how does mankind benefit from an invisible and hidden representative?” The Imam replied, “just as they benefit from the sun when the clouds hide it!” (Bihar al-Anwar, v. 52, ch 20, p 92)

 

Returning to the issue of the succession of ‘Ali to the Prophet, if Mawlana Rumi were to follow the path of Sunnism he would define the term Mawla as anything but master, because the word master gives the Shi’a a polemical advantage. The Sunni tend to refrain from that definition and instead use the word “friend”, Mawlana Rumi differs by saying:

 

“Who is Mawla? He who sets you free and removes the fetters of

slavery from your feet.

Since prophethood is the guide to freedom, freedom is bestowed on

true believers by the prophets.” (3,I:423-5)

 

The guarantor of freedom is always the master, it would seem peculiar if not unfitting if the term Mawla were to be meant friend in the above couplet. Nevertheless another argument used by the Shi’as is that Mawlana Rumi recognizes the importance of the event of Ghadeer Khumm. The event of Ghadeer Khumm is regarded as one of the most important events in Shi’a history. The significance of this date is in the Shi’a claim that Prophet Muhammad was commanded by the Almighty to culminate the entirety of his tireless work, the spreading of the message of Islam, into the appointment of ‘Ali as the Mawla, master of the Muslims after him.

 

“For this reason the Prophet, who labored with the utmost zeal, applied

the name mawla to himself and to ‘Ali.

He said, my cousin ‘Ali is the mawla and friend of every one of whom

I am the mawla and friend.” (3,VI:4538-9)

 

The Shi’a interpretation of the Qur’anic verses revealed to Muhammad immediately prior to the Ghadeer Khumm event clearly coincides with the above couplet of Rumi.

 

“O Apostle! deliver that which has been revealed to you from your Lord; and if you do it not, then you have not delivered His message, and Allah will protect you from the people.” (5.67)”

 

Both illustrate the extremity in importance of the appointment of ‘Ali by reaffirming the immensely laborious and difficult task of Prophet-hood, Mawlana Rumi portrays the appointing of ‘Ali as the Mawla as a drastic measure, he “labored with the utmost zeal”. One works with zeal only in the rarest of circumstances. Whilst the Qur’anic verse places an ultimatum on the Prophet that if he does not appoint ‘Ali all his work would be in vain, for he would have “not delivered His (God’s) message”.

 

Mawlana Rumi, in the catalogues of history undoubtedly is seen as a great Sunni reference while also being in the forefront of all Sufi-masters. This outlook on him is not incorrect for it is known that he was a Hanafi jurist and theologian, descending from a line of such scholars. (Chittick 133) However, as discussed earlier, the Shi’a tend to treat all those who accept ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib as the immediate wali after the Prophet Muhammad as one of their own. The special significance of ‘Ali being the wali after the Prophet is that the Prophetic commandment all Muslims to give ‘Ali bay’at, as in allegiance to ‘Ali, the Prophet proclaimed:

 

“Do I not have more right over the believers than what they have over themselves?” The People cried and answered: “Yes, O’ Messenger of God.” Then the Prophet held up the hand of Ali and said: “Whoever I am his master (Mawla), Ali is his master (Mawla). O’ God, love those who love him, and be hostile to those who are hostile to him.” (Musnad ibn Hanbal, v. 4, p 368)

 

‘Ali is the initiator of all spiritual chains in Sufism, henceforth the ceremony of ‘Ali attaining the station of master, Mawla, and the raising of the hand for bay’at is as “the grafting of the bitter existence of man to the divine tree in order for it to produce sweet fruit”. (Pazouki 31)

 

“Either take up the axe and strike like a man—like ‘Ali

Destroy this gate of Khaybar—

Or unite these thorns with the rosebush:

Unite the light of the friend (of God) with the fire (your soul)

In order that this light may extinguish your fire,

(and that) union with Him may make your thorns roses.” (II:1244-46)

 

“The Mary of the heart will not conceive the breath of the Messiah

Until the divine trust comes from one hidden place to another”

(3,II:1244-46)

 

Without the swearing of allegiance towards the wali one’s heart would never be able to attain the desired station of love, walayah.

Moving on, to slightly distance the legacy of Mawlana Rumi from the Sunni Orthodoxy we must look at the subtle barbs he writes towards the orthodoxy. Mawlana Rumi is known to have originally been a Sunni Orthodox scholar who changed his views only after having an epiphany caused by meeting Shams al-Din Tabrizi. Shams al-Din Tabrizi led him to forgo the knowledge he previously knew and dedicated his life to and instead learn and accept what he, Shams al-Din Tabrizi gave which was purely walayah. He defines walayah as the love that draws one closer to the divine. This love is indicative in much of his collection Diwan-i-Shams. In his writings he clearly describes his search for love by highlighting that the Orthodox knowledge of fiqh, jurisprudence, he studied would never lead him to his desired destination. Mawlana Rumi says:

 

“In that quarter where love was increasing (my) pain,

Bu Hanifa and Shafi’i gave no instruction” (3,III: 3832).

 

The fuquha, jurists, of Sunnism did not leave behind any teachings in regards to walayah. He further disassociates himself by rejecting the Sahihayn, Sahih al-Muslim and Sahih al-Bukhari, the most authentic Sunni texts in his quest for walayah. He says:

“Without the two Sahihs and narrations and narrators; nay, (they behold him)

in the place where they drink the Water of Life” (3, I:3464).

 

After the Qur’an, for the Sunnis the Sahihs are regarded as authentic and unquestionable. How could a Sunni with such depth of knowledge disregard the quotes, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad? Mawlana Rumi comes to the understanding that the sought love is not attainable through the vast resources of Orthodox Sunnism, the textual evidences; they only are attained through divine communication of the heart. Mawlana Rumi writes in Diwan-i-Shams:

 

“Love is nothing but a divine fortune and grace

It is nothing but openness of heart and guidance

Bu Hanifa did not teach love

Shafi‘i has narrated nothing about it

Malik knows nothing about the secret of love

Hanbal does not comprehend it (1, 100).”

 

Surprisingly, Mawlana Rumi also rejects the Sunni usage of qiyas (deductive analogy) as a means towards understanding the religion. This criticism of qiyas is one that is specific to Shi’ism. For Shi’a argue that not only is aql, intellect valid, but after the Prophet and the Qur’an the awliya, the Imams, are the ones who maintain the right to give explicit statements, Mawlana Rumi says:

 

“In a case where he does not find an explicit statement, there he will produce an

example from analogy.

Know for sure that the explicit statement is the revelation of the Holy

Spirit and that the analogy made by personal reasoning is subordinate to this”

(3,III: 3582-3).

Mawlana Rumi closes the debate on where to derive instructions by rejecting all that is emphasized in Sunnism and instead accept only what is said by the wali:

“Know that beside the breath (words) of the qutb of the time

transmitted knowledge is like performing the ritual ablution with sand

when there is water” (3, IV: 1418).
Mawlana Rumi is trying to emphasize that the scholars of religion are wasting time researching the authenticity of Hadith or Qur’anic Tafsir, exegesis, for the dictation of the qutb is all what is necessary. This directly relates with the Shi’a interpretation of the Hadith al-Thaqalayn, the Prophet Muhammad announced:

“I’m leaving among you something which is very important and should be followed, you will not go astray if you get hold of it after I am gone, one part of it being more important than the other: Allah’s Book, which is a rope stretched from Heaven to Earth, and my close relatives, who belong to my household. These two will not separate from one another till they come down to the reservoir, so consider how you act regarding them after my departure.” (Sahih Tirmidhi)

The qutb for Mawlana Rumi and the Sufis in general are the interpreters and guardians of knowledge likewise the Shi’a Imams are the caretakers of the Qur’an. Thus their word is the word, everything else is useless.

In retrospect the aforementioned should give some insight as to what the Shi’a view is on Sufism.

Citations

Chittick, William C.. “Rumi’s View of Imam Husayn.” London Academy of Iranian Studies: n. pag. Print.

Chittick, William C.. “Me and Rumi: The Autobiography of Shams-I Tabrizi” Fons Vitae: n. pag. Print.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. “Shi’ism and Sufism: Their Relationship in Essence and in History.” Cambridge University Press, Religious Studies 6: 229-242. Print.

Nicholson, Reynold, A., (1972),  The Mathnawi of Jalaluddin Rumi, London: Luzac

Pazouki, Sharam. “Spiritual Walayah or Love in the Mathnavi Mawlawi.” London Academy of Iranian Studies Press: n. pag. Print.

Qadri, Muhammad Tahir-ul. The Ghadir Declaration. Lahore: Minhaj-ul-Qur’an Publications , 2002. Print.

Tabandeh, Hajj Nor ‘Ali. “Shi’ism, Sufism and Gnosticism (‘Irfan).” London Academy of Iranian Studies Press: n. pag. Print.

Virani, Shafique N. The Ismailis in the Middle Ages: A History of Survival, A Search for Salvation (New York: Oxford University Press), 2007, p. 51.

Extended Resources

Abun-Nasr, Jamil M. “The Special Sufi Paths (Tariqas).” Muslim Communities of Grace: The Sufi Brotherhoods in Islamic Religious Life. New York: Columbia UP, 2007. 86-96.

John Porter Brown, The Dervishes, OUP, 1927, pp.100-110

Kugle, Scott Alan (2007). Sufis & saints’ bodies: Mysticism, Corporeality and Sacred Power in Islam. University of North Carolina Press. p. 143. ISBN 0-8078-5789-0. See Google book search.

Kabbani, Muhammad Hisham (2004). Classical Islam and the Naqshbandi Sufi Tradition. Islamic Supreme Council of America. p. 557.

Algar, Hamid; Algar, Hamid; Nizami, K.A. “Naḳshbandiyya.” Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs. Brill, 2010. Brill Online. Augustana. 15 April 2010

Hunt Janin, The Pursuit of Learning in the Islamic World 610-2003, p 83. ISBN 0786429046

Corbin, Henry (1993 (original French 1964)). History of Islamic Philosophy, Translated by Liadain Sherrard, Philip Sherrard. London; Kegan Paul International in association with Islamic Publications for The Institute of Ismaili Studies.

Dabashi, Hamid, and Seyyed V. Nasr. “Mulla Muhsin Fayd Kashani.” Shi’ism: Doctrines, Thoughts, and Spirituality. Ed. Seyyed H. Nasr. Albany: State University of New York, 1988. 307-08. Print.

Takim, Liyakat. “The Concepts of the Absolute and Perfect Man in Mulla Fayd Al-Kashani.” Liyakat Takim. University of Denver, Colorado, Aug. 2008. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.

Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics , No. 14, Madness and Civilization / الجنون والحضارة‎‎ (1994) , pp. 192-205

Music and Related Practices in Chishti Sufìsm: Celebrations and Contestations Raziuddin Aquil Social Scientist , Vol. 40, No. 3/4 (March-April 2012) , pp. 17-32

The Politics of Sufism: Redefining the Saints of Pakistan Katherine Ewing The Journal of Asian Studies , Vol. 42, No. 2 (Feb., 1983) , pp. 251-268

The Creative Imagination of the Sufi Mystic, Ibn ‘Arabi Fredrica R. Halligan Journal of Religion and Health , Vol. 40, No. 2 (Summer, 2001) , pp. 275-287

METAPHYSICS OF MULLĀ ṢADRĀ: II MUHAMMAD ‘ABDUL-HAQ Islamic Studies , Vol. 10, No. 4 (DECEMBER 1971) , pp. 291-317

The Bektashi Institutions in Southeastern Europe: Alternative Muslim Official Structures and their Limits Nathalie Clayer Die Welt des Islams , Vol. 52, Issue 2 (2012) , pp. 183-203

Ambiguous Sanctuaries and Bektashi Propaganda F. W. Hasluck The Annual of the British School at Athens , Vol. 20, (1913/1914) , pp. 94-119

Spiritual Surrender: From Companionship to Hierarchy in the History of Bektashism Albert Doja Numen , Vol. 53, Fasc. 4 (2006) , pp. 448-510

Religio-Secular Metamorphoses: The Re-Making of Turkish Alevism Markus Dressler Journal of the American Academy of Religion , Vol. 76, No. 2 (Jun., 2008) , pp. 280-311

Between Nationalism, Modernism and Secularism: The Ambivalent Place of ‘Alevi Identities’ TALHA KOSE Middle Eastern Studies , Vol. 49, No. 4 (July 2013) , pp. 590-607

The Safavid Synthesis: From Qizilbash Islam to Imamite Shi’ism Kathryn Babayan Iranian Studies , Vol. 27, No. 1/4, Religion and Society in Islamic Iran during the Pre-Modern Era (1994) , pp. 135-161

The Nuṣayrī-ʿAlawī Religion: An Enquiry into its Theology and Liturgy. (Jerusalem Studies in Religion and Culture Vol. 1) / ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻃﻘﻮﺳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ by Meir M. Bar-Asher; ﻣﻴﺮ ﻡ. ﺑﺎﺭ ﺃﺷﻴﺮ; Aryeh Kofsky Khader Salameh; ﺃﺭﻳﺔ ﻛﻮﻓﺴﻜﻲ ﺧﺎﺩﺭ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ Review by: SAJJAD H. RIZVI and ﺱ. ﺭﻳﺰﻓﻲ Journal of Qur’anic Studies , Vol. 5, No. 1 (2003) , pp. 82-88

The Office of Khalīfat Al-Khulafā under the Ṣafawids Roger M. Savory Journal of the American Oriental Society , Vol. 85, No. 4 (Oct. – Dec., 1965) , pp. 497-502

Time and Creation: The Contribution of Some Safavid Philosophies Sajjad H. Rizvi Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia , T. 62, Fasc. 2/4, Entre Razão e Revelação: A’Lógica’ da Dimensão Semíta na Filosofia / Between Reason and Revelation: The ‘Logic’ of the Semitic Dimension in Philosophy (Apr. – Dec., 2006) , pp. 713-737

Minorsky, “The Poetry of Shāh Ismā‘īl I,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 10/4 (1942): 1006–53.

A Medieval Saint on Sainthood Richard J. A. McGregor Studia Islamica , No. 95 (2002) , pp. 95-108

A Šīʿī Life Cycle according to al-Barqī’s Kitāb al-Maḥāsin Roy Vilozny Arabica , T. 54, Fasc. 3 (Jul., 2007) , pp. 362-396

Chodkiewicz, Michel. The Seal of the Saints: Prophethood and Sainthood in the Doctrine of Ibn ‘Arabi. trans. Liadain Sherrard. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society, 1993.

Radtke, Bernd, and John O’Kane. The Concept of Sainthood in Early Islamic Mysticism: Two Works by Al-Hakim Al-Tirmidhi. Richmond, Surrey, UK: Curzon Press, 1996, pp. 10, 109.

TAWḤĪD AND THE DOCTRINE OF ‘IṢMAH KEMAL FARUKI Islamic Studies , Vol. 4, No. 1 (MARCH 1965) , pp. 31-43

The Nizârî ismâ’îlîtes’ Abolishment of the sharî’a during the “Great Resurrection” of 1164 A.D./559 A.H. Jorunn J. Buckley Studia Islamica , No. 60 (1984) , pp. 137-165

Gleave, Robert (2011). Islam and literalism: Literal meaning and interpretation in Islamic legal theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Carl W. Ernst, Words of Ecstasy in Sufism, pg. 163. Albany: SUNY Press, 1983.

Ignác Goldziher, The Zahiris, pg. 165. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1971

“Saints and miracles” of: Reynold A. Nicholson, The Mystics of Islam. 2002.

Trimingham, J. Spencer. The Sufi Orders in Islam. Oxford University Press. 1971.

Debate over the Karāmah of Allah’s Friends Muhammad Amanullah Arab Law Quarterly , Vol. 18, No. 3/4 (2003) , pp. 365-374

The Light beyond the Shore in the Theology of Proper Sufi Moral Conduct (Adab) Qamar-ul Huda Journal of the American Academy of Religion , Vol. 72, No. 2 (Jun., 2004) , pp. 461-484

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. “Ali”. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Archived from the original on October 18, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-12.

Khalifa Ali bin Abu Talib – Ali, The Father of Sufism”. Alim.org. Retrieved 2013-12-31.

Ahmed Raza. “Noor o Bashar ::Islamic Books, Books Library”. Faizaneraza.org. Retrieved 2012-09-24.

  1. C. Asthana & A.Nirmal. Urban Terrorism : Myths And Realities. Publisher Pointer Publishers, 2009 ISBN 81-7132-598-X, 9788171325986. pg. 67

Clinton Bennett. Muslims and modernity: an introduction to the issues and debates. Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005 ISBN 0-8264-5481-X, 9780826454812. pg. 189

Muḥammad Yūsūf Ludhiyānvī (1999). Differences in the Ummah and the straight path. Zam Zam Publishers. pp. 35–38. Retrieved 20 April 2011.

Some Imāmī-shīʿī Views on Taqiyya Etan Kohlberg Journal of the American Oriental Society , Vol. 95, No. 3 (Jul. – Sep., 1975) , pp. 395-402

The Legitimacy and Nature of Mawid al-Nabī: (Analysis of a Fatwā) Aviva Schussman Islamic Law and Society , Vol. 5, No. 2 (1998) , pp. 214-234

Playing or Praying: A Sufi Saint’s Day in Surat Peter Van Der Veer The Journal of Asian Studies , Vol. 51, No. 3 (Aug., 1992) , pp. 545-564

Shia Lamentation Rituals and Reinterpretations of the Doctrine of Intercession: Two Cases from Modern India David Pinault History of Religions , Vol. 38, No. 3 (Feb., 1999) , pp. 285-305

Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi: The Spirituality of Shiʿi Islam. xxii, 585 pp. London: I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2011. £39.50. ISBN 978 1 84511 738 2.

Mutahhari, Murtaza; Tabataba’i, Muhammad Husayn; Khomeini, Ruhollah (2000). Light Within Me. Ansariyan Publications.

“Irfan” Revisited: Khomeini and the Legacy of Islamic Mystical Philosophy Alexander Knysh Middle East Journal , Vol. 46, No. 4 (Autumn, 1992) , pp. 631-653

The Philosophical Significance of the Imām in Ismā’īlism Sami N. Makarem Studia Islamica , No. 27 (1967) , pp. 41-53

Imamate and Love: The Discourse of the Divine in Islamic Mysticism ‘Abd al-Hakeem Carney Journal of the American Academy of Religion , Vol. 73, No. 3 (Sep., 2005) , pp. 705-730

Twilight of the Idols? Pluralism and Mystical Praxis in Islam Abd al-Hakeem Carney International Journal for Philosophy of Religion , Vol. 64, No. 1 (Aug., 2008) , pp. 1-20

Najm al-Din al-Tufi, Sharh Mukhtasar al-Rawdah (Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risålah, 1410H), 3:6

The Sufi Pir-o-murshid (“Make thy Sheikh thy Qiblah”) AKHTAR QAMBER India International Centre Quarterly , Vol. 19, No. 4 (WINTER 1992) , pp. 14-27

The Establishment of the Position of Marja’iyyt-i Taqlid in the Twelver-Shi’i Community Ahmad Kazemi Moussavi Iranian Studies , Vol. 18, No. 1 (Winter, 1985) , pp. 35-51

“Pīr” and “Murshid”: An Aspect of Religious Leadership in West Pakistan Adrian C. Mayer Middle Eastern Studies , Vol. 3, No. 2 (Jan., 1967) , pp. 160-169

Other Links:

http://abdurrahman.org/innovation/Sufism_Shiism.pdf

http://sunnirazvi.net/sufism/history/shiites.htm

http://www.majzooban.org/en/articles/252-the-imm-and-the-qub-the-axis-mundi-in-shiism-and-sufism.html

http://www.isfahan.org.uk/glossary/sufi/sufism2.html

http://www.academia.edu/2478810/Bektashism_and_Shia_Islam

http://sindh.hypotheses.org/296